|
Post by stuckinthemiddle on Apr 8, 2012 2:56:46 GMT -5
I give Hakeem Nicks and 1.02 I get Demarco Murray, Victor Cruz, 2.01
|
|
|
Post by weekendwarriors on Apr 8, 2012 7:52:27 GMT -5
thats interesting, its certainly good enough to make me really think about it but alot would depend on team needs, scoring, chance of t-rich falling to 1.2, etc..
It good enought that I have gone back and forth a couple of times but not so good that I would make this decision without weighing those other factors.
|
|
|
Post by Coin Flip on Apr 8, 2012 7:55:15 GMT -5
I like the Nicks 1.02 side by a nice margin If you need RB help I could see liking the opposite side.
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Apr 8, 2012 9:00:49 GMT -5
I like the Nicks 1.02 side by a nice margin If you need RB help I could see liking the opposite side. I agree with Coin here, you'd be losing on both sides....Nicks > Cruz and 1.2 > Murray, and the 2.1 is a crapshoot for me and not enough to bridge the gap.
|
|
|
Post by overachiever77 on Apr 8, 2012 10:17:17 GMT -5
What is your league size so we know what overall pick the 2.01 is? I doubt I'd make that deal at least until after the draft to know where everyone goes. A RB other than Richardson could land in a great spot and be more valuable than Murray. And on that note, do you think Richardson is definitely going #1? If not, there's a chance you get him sitting at 1.02.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Apr 8, 2012 10:22:00 GMT -5
I like the Nicks 1.02 side by a nice margin If you need RB help I could see liking the opposite side. I agree with Coin here, you'd be losing on both sides....Nicks > Cruz and 1.2 > Murray, and the 2.1 is a crapshoot for me and not enough to bridge the gap. Agree with the rest
|
|
|
Post by stuckinthemiddle on Apr 8, 2012 12:31:39 GMT -5
I can pretty much guarantee Richardson is going 1st overall (I have the pick). This is a 12 team non-PPR league. 1 point per 10 rushing/receiving yards. 6 point touchdowns. We keep 7 players.
My Roster AP, Forte, McGahee Nicks, Bowe, Austin Gronkowski 1.01, 1.02
|
|
|
Post by shamrock84 on Apr 8, 2012 13:02:55 GMT -5
Yeah I wouldn't touch this trade. Nicks and the 1.02 is WAY more valuable than the rest IMO. Cruz and Murray both looked great last year but that's a pretty small sample size to go all in on.
|
|
|
Post by orangecrush on Apr 12, 2012 10:56:06 GMT -5
Again, I'm pretty late to the party on a response, but there is no way I would accept this offer. Murray was brittle in college and in his first year in the NFL. While I like Cruz, let's see him repeat his 2011 performance before we go all "Calvin Johnson" on him. I don't know who your QB's are, but that 1.02 pick will net one of them. Adding Richardson and either Luck or RBIII sounds like a good way to strengthen any team.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Apr 12, 2012 10:58:44 GMT -5
Don't forget Dallas is going to draft the new complement to Murray in the draft.....RBBC in Big D like they do every year.
|
|
|
Post by stuckinthemiddle on Apr 12, 2012 13:28:15 GMT -5
Don't forget Dallas is going to draft the new complement to Murray in the draft.....RBBC in Big D like they do every year. You mean Felix Jones isn't going to be relevant?
|
|
|
Post by tidewaterjc on Apr 12, 2012 22:34:56 GMT -5
I like the Nicks 1.02 side by a nice margin If you need RB help I could see liking the opposite side. I agree with Coin here, you'd be losing on both sides....Nicks > Cruz and 1.2 > Murray, and the 2.1 is a crapshoot for me and not enough to bridge the gap. Agreed, and I am a Murray supporter... BUT Nicks is a stud
|
|