|
Post by Jaysports on Apr 9, 2012 18:31:59 GMT -5
Who would you rather have in dynasty and why?
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Apr 9, 2012 18:34:15 GMT -5
Gresham. Better talent to my eye and has a stable QB situation.
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Apr 9, 2012 18:35:16 GMT -5
Gresham. Better talent to my eye and has a stable QB situation. What do you mean, you don't like Locker's pin-point accuracy?
|
|
|
Post by shamrock84 on Apr 9, 2012 18:45:26 GMT -5
I actually think Cook is a better talent but Gresham is far more consistent and will be much more reliable. I take Gresham fairly easily.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Apr 9, 2012 18:46:07 GMT -5
Gresham. Better talent to my eye and has a stable QB situation. What do you mean, you don't like Locker's pin-point accuracy? At UW he could easily hit cheerleaders on out routs. It comes down to "do you believe he was aiming at the cheerleaders" that will answer the accuracy question.
|
|
|
Post by houdini on Apr 9, 2012 20:24:44 GMT -5
I think it's pretty close and I believe both TE's will progress nicely in 2012. Slight edge to Gresham due to QB.
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Apr 9, 2012 23:27:07 GMT -5
I take Cook here, higher ceiling due to being more explosive as far as what I've seen so far.
|
|
g
Newbie
Posts: 32
|
Post by g on Apr 10, 2012 13:04:58 GMT -5
Gresham, not even close imo
|
|
|
Post by Coin Flip on Apr 10, 2012 14:34:36 GMT -5
Gresham for me but it doesnt mean I dont like Cook. I expect him to increase his numbers and end up in the top 10.
Gresham just has the TE build and mental attitude of a determined player and shows he wants the ball without being all RANDY MOSS about it.
|
|
|
Post by TD_Vulture on Apr 10, 2012 14:51:07 GMT -5
Give me Cook
|
|