|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 29, 2012 17:43:45 GMT -5
Thanks to Gamblers and Scorp for their help, you guys are truly an asset here at DFW!
Let me know if anything looks out of place.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Mar 29, 2012 17:45:37 GMT -5
well my notes somehow made it next to the players names....which probably shouldnt be there.
Also noticed instead of N/R for guys we didnt rank it just keeps going up (ei 51, 52, 53) which is wrong since we didnt rank anyone above 50
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 29, 2012 18:00:24 GMT -5
Comments are fixed. There were more than 50 all said and done since you each had some players that the other didn't. I built a formula for the players who were only ranked by one of you so we could have a bigger more accurate list. However I failed to go back and edit it so that it shows NR for those players who weren't ranked by one of you. I'll have to fix it here in a bit.
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 29, 2012 19:03:00 GMT -5
well my notes somehow made it next to the players names....which probably shouldnt be there. Also noticed instead of N/R for guys we didnt rank it just keeps going up (ei 51, 52, 53) which is wrong since we didnt rank anyone above 50 Fixed Gamblers, however you did give me 51.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Mar 29, 2012 20:08:05 GMT -5
lol...well he's first off the bench then
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 29, 2012 22:15:58 GMT -5
Nice work guys. Jay, I might suggest adding the players' NFL team next to their names. In general I think it's a good idea to dumb things down so the newb to IDP can use the DFW as a resource too along with the vets.
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 30, 2012 0:05:39 GMT -5
Nice work guys. Jay, I might suggest adding the players' NFL team next to their names. In general I think it's a good idea to dumb things down so the newb to IDP can use the DFW as a resource too along with the vets. I agree 100%, I'm adding that along with each player's age tomorrow. Thx for the feedback. Let me know if you have any rankings you want to share and I'll mix'em in.
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 30, 2012 9:30:06 GMT -5
Nice work guys. Jay, I might suggest adding the players' NFL team next to their names. In general I think it's a good idea to dumb things down so the newb to IDP can use the DFW as a resource too along with the vets. I agree 100%, I'm adding that along with each player's age tomorrow. Thx for the feedback. Let me know if you have any rankings you want to share and I'll mix'em in. I just emailed you my LB rankings
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 30, 2012 9:35:16 GMT -5
Got them JScott, emailed you back. Thx so much for your support, we appreciate it so much!
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 30, 2012 9:53:26 GMT -5
Got them JScott, emailed you back. Thx so much for your support, we appreciate it so much! Glad to help. Didn't get an email back though if it was anything important.
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 30, 2012 10:53:38 GMT -5
As for the rankings, a few guys jumped out at me with fairly significant ranking differences.
1.) That much McCarthy love. I know Munchak is talking him up and he had a nice string of 4 games after taking over for Ruud but he seemed to hit the rookie wall to end the season. He flashed potential but I only have him in my top-20 (#17) due to the historical production of MLB on the Titans. I need to see more first.
2.) I'm assuming Scorp doesn't think Beason will come back to form after his Achilles to rank him that low. But if so, why isn't Anderson much higher.
3.) Von being so low on Gambler's board. Miller's a stud in the making. He was on pace to be in the top 10 at LB in his rookie season before his thumb fell off. He's only going to get better.
4.) This may be due to timing but after PHI acquired Ryans to play MLB he shot up my list. He goes back to his natural position and I think he gets back to his early years pro-bowl level self, now that he's also recovered from his Achilles. 5.) Barnett all over the place. As high as 6th, as low at 41st. What's also telling is where each rated Sheppard, who IMO will take over as the big dawg LB soon in BUF, which is why I have them rated about the same.
6.) Is Scorp a Jets fan? I'd like to hear his take on Harris at #9.
7.) No love for Ayers besides me.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Mar 30, 2012 11:16:09 GMT -5
Too address my Von Miller ranking, he;s exactly where I want him. I play tackle heavy leagues and honestly Von turned out to be a liability there. I expect him to be 3rd on his own team in tackles behind DJ, and Irvin. Yes he's fast off the edge, but he's a one trick pony and that trick doesn't generate enough points in the leagues I play in to justify being ranked over solid inside backers. Also, my ranking of Barnett was factored from the news of the change to the 4-3 in Buffalo and hints he will will be moved outside. Obviously if that changes so will his ranking. just my 2cents
|
|
|
Post by Jaysports on Mar 30, 2012 11:27:56 GMT -5
Too address my Von Miller ranking, he;s exactly where I want him. I play tackle heavy leagues and honestly Von turned out to be a liability there. I expect him to be 3rd on his own team in tackles behind DJ, and Irvin. Yes he's fast off the edge, but he's a one trick pony and that trick doesn't generate enough points in the leagues I play in to justify being ranked over solid inside backers. Also, my ranking of Barnett was factored from the news of the change to the 4-3 in Buffalo and hints he will will be moved outside. Obviously if that changes so will his ranking. just my 2cents I've heard the same in regards to Barnett, I think they said he would still be in on the dime package too though. If he lost his ability as a 3-down LB he'd be hurting. I still think he's better than you're giving credit, but to each his own. ;D
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 30, 2012 11:36:43 GMT -5
Too address my Von Miller ranking, he;s exactly where I want him. I play tackle heavy leagues and honestly Von turned out to be a liability there. I expect him to be 3rd on his own team in tackles behind DJ, and Irvin. Yes he's fast off the edge, but he's a one trick pony and that trick doesn't generate enough points in the leagues I play in to justify being ranked over solid inside backers. Also, my ranking of Barnett was factored from the news of the change to the 4-3 in Buffalo and hints he will will be moved outside. Obviously if that changes so will his ranking. just my 2cents Good info, thanks for the explanation.
|
|
|
Post by gambler on Mar 30, 2012 11:52:08 GMT -5
Too address my Von Miller ranking, he;s exactly where I want him. I play tackle heavy leagues and honestly Von turned out to be a liability there. I expect him to be 3rd on his own team in tackles behind DJ, and Irvin. Yes he's fast off the edge, but he's a one trick pony and that trick doesn't generate enough points in the leagues I play in to justify being ranked over solid inside backers. Also, my ranking of Barnett was factored from the news of the change to the 4-3 in Buffalo and hints he will will be moved outside. Obviously if that changes so will his ranking. just my 2cents I've heard the same in regards to Barnett, I think they said he would still be in on the dime package too though. If he lost his ability as a 3-down LB he'd be hurting. I still think he's better than you're giving credit, but to each his own. ;D Not saying I won't change my mind. It's early and I'm working off spotty information here. Just making an educated guess at this point
|
|